Ensemble home
Project information:
Resources:
Sponsor:
|
The relative role of the various fresh water sources
Here, we compare model results for salinities the Skagerrak/Kattegat/eastern
North Sea. These results were obtained when only parts of the fresh water
forcing was included (or no such forcing), with results that were obtained
when all sources were included. By fresh water forcing, we here mean both
the direct run-off into this basin, and the indirect run-off via fluxes of
brackish waters from the Baltic Sea. The depictions show the salinity
surpluses (at 5 m depth) that arises under the various reduced
fresh water forcing cases. Values are in practical salinity units (PSU).
Case I: No fresh water forcing
When fresh water forcing is disregarded altogether, the salinity in the
Kattegat rises by about 5-9 PSU, whereas the salinity in the Skagerrak
rises by 2-6 PSU. Values west of Jutland and in the NCC in the eastern
North Sea increase by 1-3 PSU:
|
|
Case II: Continental rivers only
Next, consider results when only continental rivers that feed into the
southern North Sea, are included. We then find results that are very similar
to Case I, with a major exception: The salinity deviations along the
west coast of Jutland are now eliminated:
|
|
Case III: Norwegian and W. Swedish rivers only
Then, consider results when only Swedish and Norwegian rivers that feed
into the Kattegat, Skagerrak and the North Sea, are included. Salinity
offsets now display a pattern that is very similar to Case I, but
the deviation from the "full forcing simulation" is now reduced by
0.5-1 PSU along the coasts of Sweden and Norway:
|
|
Case IV: Baltic outflow only
Finally, consider the case when the outflow of brackish water from
the Baltic Sea through the Belts and Öresund are applied. The
deviations from the"full forcing simulation" is now only about
1 PSU in the entire domain except for the coastal region to the
west and the south-west of Jutland (deviation maxima are also seen
along the rim of the Skagerrak):
|
|
|